SStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others · Study

Home/scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others

Pentti A. Nieminen, Gerta Rücker, Jouko Miettunen, James R. Carpenter, Martin Christian Schumacher

2007-05-07articleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology78 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

1991Publication bias in clinical research

2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials

1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities

2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research

1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence

2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation

1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data

Cited by

2008An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997–2007

2011Dissemination biases in ecology: effect sizes matter more than quality

2010Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles

2015Replication and contradiction of highly cited research papers in psychiatry: 10-year follow-up

2010One in four citations in marine biology papers is inappropriate

2015Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates?

2009Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses

2009The relationship between reviewers’ quality-scores and number of citations for papers published in the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology from 2003–2005

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

Languageen

Files0 public / 0

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.014

openalex_workW2154356129

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.