SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Minimal Clinically Important Difference as Applied in Rheumatology: An OMERACT Rasch Working Group Systematic Review and Critique
13 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Minimal Clinically Important Difference as Applied in Rheumatology: An OMERACT Rasch Working Group Systematic Review and Critique (2015)Minimal Clinically Important Difference a…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis (2013)Responsiveness and minimally …A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods (2011)A point of minimal important …The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Minimally Important Diffe…Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders. (2007)Minimal clinically important …A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis (2004)A comparison of generic, indi…What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. (2003)What is the relationship betw…Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life (2003)Defining clinically meaningfu…The Concept of Clinically Meaningful Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Research (2000)The Concept of Clinically Mea…Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (2000)Determining minimally importa…Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. (1989)Ordinal scales and foundation…Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. (1989)Observations are always ordin…Measurement of health status (1989)Measurement of health statusMinimal Clinically Important Difference (2018)Minimal Clinically Important …A power primer. (1992)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels (2004)Combining Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches to Determine Minimally Important Differences (2005)Interpreting score differences in the Insomnia Severity Index: using health-related outcomes to define the minimally important difference (2009)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research (1981)GUIDELINES TO STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF DATA FROM RATING SCALES AND QUESTIONNAIRES (2001)Application of Rasch Analysis in the Development and Application of Quality of Life Instruments (2004)Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations (2007)Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look (2004)Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes (2005)Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach (2006)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data (2020)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States (2005)Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores (2017)Rating scale analysis (1982)A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation (2006)The MOS Short-form General Health Survey (1988)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Adult measures of general health and health‐related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36‐Item (SF‐36) and Short Form 12‐Item (SF‐12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF‐6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well‐Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQ O L) (2011)The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review (2014)A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing the Measurement Properties of the Three-Level and Five-Level Versions of the EQ-5D (2018)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research (2013)Sleep Health: Can We Define It? Does It Matter? (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
  • 2003Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life1,333 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 1989Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.676 cited
  • 2011A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods648 cited
  • 2000Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis502 cited
  • 1989Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference.493 cited
  • 2000The Concept of Clinically Meaningful Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Research488 cited
  • 2003What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.406 cited
  • 2004A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis398 cited
  • 2007Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders.195 cited
  • 2013Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis159 cited
  • 2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials
141 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Minimal Clinically Important Difference99 cited