Article1990

Structure, Action, and Outcomes: The Dynamics of Power in Social Exchange

234 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Sociological Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Social Power and Status Dynamics Game Theory and Voting Systems Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Abstract

Two levels of power - the structure of power in exchange networks, and the strategic use of power resources by actors - affect the frequency and distribution of exchange outcomes. Theories of power and exchange suggest alternative hypotheses about how structural power and strategic action are related to each other and to outcomes. These are tested with data from a series of experiments in which power relations are based on control over rewards and punishments. Both structural power and its strategic use have substantial effects on exchange outcomes, but structure and action are related only weakly to each other. Their relative effects on exchange outcomes vary with the base of power. Structural power has stronger effects on reward exchange, and strategic action on punishment exchange. The asymmetry of reward exchange in the relation, the traditional measure of power use in powerldependence theory, is affected by both. Social scientists have conceptualized power in various ways: as a structural potential (Bierstedt 1950; Wrong 1968; Emerson 1962), as a process of behavioral or tactical influence (Rubin and Brown 1975; Michener and Suchner 1972; Tedeschi and Bonoma 1972), and as the successful outcome of influence (Dahl 1957; Mayhew, Gray, and Richardson 1969; Simon 1957). I argue that a complete analysis of power must include all three facets. Understanding the relations among them requires integrating concepts at micro and macro levels of analysis (Alexander 1987; Munch and Smelser 1987). The macro level of power is the structure of control that provides the opportunities and constraints within which the micro level of power, the strategic behavior of actors, operates. Together, structure and action produce outcomes of consequence for actors and relationships. I investigate how structure and action affect the amount and distribution of exchange in power/dependence relations. Previous research on power and exchange has studied only the relations between power structure (the struc* This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES-84 19872). I am

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 234 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk 2017Exchange and Power in Social Life 1962Power-Dependence Relations 1959The Social Psychology of Groups 1963Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms 2007The concept of power 1958Models of Man--Social and Rational 1978Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks

Cited by

2011Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange 1993Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks 2015When, why, and how do powerholders “feel the power”? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility 1996Gender, Control, and Interaction 2011How ICT shifts the power balance of tourism distribution channels 1992Power Processes in Bargaining 2009Power and Relation in the World Polity: The INGO Network Country Score, 1978-1998

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.