Positivist Victimology: A Critique Part 2: Critical Victimology

Abstract

So far I have argued that in its attempt to explain victimisation by an examination of those held to be victims, and in its particular concentration on the notion of victim-types, on victims of inter-personal crime and on those who contribute to their own victimisation, positivist victimology has faced profound theoretical and operational difficulties which have inevitably limited its explanatory potential. What it has signally failed to do is to explain the everyday social process of identifying and responding to victimising events. The second part of this article examines the central role which this process performs in social life, and proceeds to analyse the parameters and the consequences of that process.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 63 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.