The role of environmental knowledge in young female consumers' evaluation and selection of apparel in South Africa

Dinele Momberg · Bertha Jacobs · Nadine Cynthia Sonnenberg

46 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Consumer Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Consumer Retail Behavior Studies Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior

Abstract

Abstract The harmful impact of the apparel supply chain on the environment is becoming a global reality. However, consumer awareness of the environmental problems caused by this industry is not always obvious in their apparel buying decisions. A qualitative approach was used to explore young female consumers' existing levels of environmental knowledge, and whether that environmental knowledge is reflected in the evaluation and selection of apparel. Non‐probability purposive sampling was used to ensure the inclusion of young female students (19–22 years old, n = 29). Participants first had to write an essay on the subject of pertinent environmental issues and then participated in a focus group discussion on the evaluation and selection of a t‐shirt. Results suggest that the participants have general environmental knowledge. They have the ability to identify environmental problems as well as the causes and consequences of these environmental problems. However, participants' environmental awareness and their knowledge pertaining to the actual production and supply of environment‐friendly apparel in the South African context were very limited. The results also highlight the product attributes important to the participants when evaluating and selecting apparel such as price, aesthetics and functionality of the garment, but environmental attributes such as organic cotton, locally produced, reduced waste techniques and not using harmful chemicals did not feature high under the attributes participants considered. They prioritized price, aesthetics and fit above other attributes (including environmental attributes). Environmental knowledge was not consciously considered in their general apparel decision making, even though participants indicated that they do care about the environment.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

References

1989The Practice of Social Research 2001Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products 2000Practice of Social Research 2000Data analysis in qualitative research 2006Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?1990Toward a Model of the In-Store Purchase Decision Process: Consumer Use of Criteria for Evaluating Women's Apparel 2002Profiling later aged female teens: mall shopping behavior and clothing choice 2010Quest for the eco‐apparel market: a study of mothers' willingness to purchase organic cotton clothing for their children

Cited by

2021The importance of product lifetime labelling for purchase decisions: Strategic implications for corporate sustainability based on a conjoint analysis in Germany 2018Factors motivating male consumers’ eco‐friendly apparel acquisition in the South African emerging market 2024Online cash waqf behavioral intention: the role of knowledge of cash waqf and trust 2019Exploring Green Purchasing Behaviour among College Students in a Developing Economy 2024What triggers people to buy green products?: Empirical evidence from an emerging market

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.