Psychopathy and Low Anxiety: Meta‐Analytic Evidence for the Absence of Inhibition, Not Affect

Abstract

Despite historical conviction that the psychopath is low-anxious, contemporary research remains equivocal. An examination of the literature suggests that the lack of consensus may be due to problems with the conceptualization of "psychopathic low anxiety." It was hypothesized that ambiguous relations could be clarified by parsing the psychopathic low anxiety construct into more discrete components: anxiety, fear, and constraint. The current study examined the relations between psychopathy and these three different low anxiety conceptualizations through three meta-analyses. Results indicated that anxiety and fear were negligibly related to psychopathy Total. In contrast, constraint demonstrated a medium negative relation with psychopathy Total. Relations showed divergence across psychopathy factor scores. Anxiety, fear, and constraint were all negatively related to Factor 1 scores, whereas anxiety was positively related, and constraint negatively related, to Factor 2 scores. These meta-analytic findings suggest that although psychopathic individuals have deficits in inhibition/constraint, they do not necessarily exhibit a consistent absence of negative affect. This interpretation is consistent with predictions regarding the personality correlates of the factors of psychopathy, indicating that while constraint composes a large part of psychopathy assessments, it is less clear how much anxiety lends to the construct.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.