SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When Philosophical Argumentation Impedes Social and Political Progress · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleWhen Philosophical Argumentation Impedes Social and Political Progress

Phyllis A Rooney2012

Article2012

When Philosophical Argumentation Impedes Social and Political Progress

Phyllis A Rooney

26 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Social Philosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Thought and Analysis Political Philosophy and Ethics Critical Theory and Philosophy

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1859On Liberty and Other Essays 1999Why so Slow? The Advancement of Women 1997Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments

Cited by

2013Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries 2020Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation 2019Informal Logic: A 'Canadian' Approach to Argument 2019On the Costs of Socially Relevant Philosophy Papers: A Reflection

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2012Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimonyarticle · 2 shared references 2001Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomesarticle · 1 shared reference 2001Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Rolesarticle · 1 shared reference 2011Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leadersarticle · 1 shared reference 2005Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.article · 1 shared reference 2002Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Educationarticle · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2012

Typearticle

Published2012-09-01

VenueJournal of Social Philosophy

ISSN-L0047-2786

Languageen

Citations26

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPhilosophical Thought and Analysis

Identifiers

doi10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01568.x

openalex_workW2156382006

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.