SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Heterogeneity in Search Strategies among Cochrane Acupuncture Reviews: Is There Room for Improvement?
2 references·3 citing·21 second hop
Heterogeneity in Search Strategies among Cochrane Acupuncture Reviews: Is There Room for Improvement? (2010)Heterogeneity in Search Strategies among …Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews (2009)Analysis of the reporting of …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The relationship of publication language, study population, risk of bias, and treatment effects in acupuncture related systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiologic study (2023)The relationship of publicati…A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study (2022)A search of only four key dat…Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture (2012)Impact of Including Korean Ra…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3) (2016)Sleep in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of polysomnographic findings in case-control studies (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence (2024)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews137 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture11 cited
  • 2023The relationship of publication language, study population, risk of bias, and treatment effects in acupuncture related systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiologic study10 cited
  • 2022A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work