Why do We Flirt? Flirting Motivations and Sex Differences in Working and Social Contexts

Abstract

Employing worker and student samples, motivations to engage in flirtatious communication are explored. Six flirting motivations, derived from Henningsen, are considered. Differences across samples are considered using cognitive valence theory as a framework. In addition to differences across worker and student samples, sex differences are also examined. Measures tapping six different flirting motivations (i.e., sexual, relational, exploring, esteem, instrumental, and fun) are utilized. Overall, and consistent with cognitive valence theory, the worker sample is less likely to view flirting as motivated by sexual or relational motivations than is the student sample. Additionally, sex differences emerge for sex and exploration motivations, with men reporting greater levels of each than women.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.