Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? S copus versus M endeley for LIS journals

16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes2,039 cited
2011Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact1,085 cited
2013Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services902 cited
2014Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective710 cited
2004Sleeping Beauties in science583 cited
2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
2013Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature434 cited
2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
2014How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications384 cited
2013Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review380 cited
2012How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations294 cited
2014Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication289 cited
2000How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication283 cited
2010Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

266 cited

2014Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community264 cited

2010How and why scholars cite on Twitter255 cited

Cited by

2015M endeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields123 cited
2018Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science91 cited
2019Social Media Metrics for New Research Evaluation85 cited
2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics78 cited
2015M endeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences72 cited
2015Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles71 cited
2020The Pros and Cons of the Use of Altmetrics in Research Assessment68 cited
2017Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields?63 cited
2017How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles57 cited
2017Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications55 cited
2017The Evolution of Current Research Impact Metrics54 cited
n.d.National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers54 cited
2015Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations49 cited
2018The life cycle of altmetric impact: A longitudinal study of six metrics from PlumX47 cited
2015Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research46 cited
2015Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?45 cited