Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy Copras

Morteza Yazdani · Ali Alidoosti · Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

170 citations0/0 files storedEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Risk and Safety Analysis Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

Abstract

Critical infrastructures play a significant role in countries because of the essentiality of nation security, public safety, socioeconomic security, and way of life. According to the importance of infrastructures, it is a necessity to analyze the potential risks to do not allow these risks be converted into events. The main purpose of this paper is to provide a developed framework with the aim to overcome limitations of the classical approach to build a more secure, safer, and more resilient critical infrastructures in order to develop, implement, control. The proposed framework extends conventional RAMCAP (Risk Analysis and Management for Critical Asset Protection) through introducing new parameters the effects on risk value. According to the complexity of problem and the inherent uncertainty, this research adopts the fuzzy COPRAS (COPRAS-F) as a fuzzy multi criteria decision making technique to determine the weights of each criterion and the importance of alternatives with respect to criteria. Case analysis is implemented to illustrate the capability and effectiveness of the model for ranking the risk of critical infrastructures. The proposed model demonstrates a significant improvement in comparison with conventional RAMCAP.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 170 citations exist upstream.

References

2009A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard 2010Risk assessment of construction projects 2011The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS 2010Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods 2005Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: A Lithuanian case 2010Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry 2006Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach☆2009Risk Analysis of Complex and Uncertain Systems

Cited by

2017Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects 2014Multi-criteria selection of a deep-water port in the Eastern Baltic Sea 2021Analysis of a Robot Selection Problem Using Two Newly Developed Hybrid MCDM Models of TOPSIS-ARAS and COPRAS-ARAS 2016FUZZY COPRAS METHOD FOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.