SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Clinical recommendations of C ochrane reviews in three different fields of pediatrics (neonatology, neuropediatrics, and complementary and alternative medicine): A systematic analysis
2 references·0 citing·6 second hop
Clinical recommendations of C ochrane reviews in three different fields of pediatrics (neonatology, neuropediatrics, and complementary and alternative medicine): A systematic analysis (2013)Clinical recommendations of C ochrane rev…Evidence‐based medicine and Cochrane reviews in neonatology: Quo vadis? (2011)Evidence‐based medicine and C…Survey of claims of no effect in abstracts of Cochrane reviews (2003)Survey of claims of no effect…Evidence‐based therapy in neonatology: distilling the evidence and applying it in practice* (2004)Cochrane reviews in pregnancy: The role of perinatal randomized trials and systematic reviews in establishing evidence (2006)What has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for newborn infants? (2009)Pitfalls in systematic reviews (2006)Reporting and interpretation of results from clinical trials that did not claim a treatment difference: survey of four general medical journals (2019)Claims of ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in Cochrane and other systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Survey of claims of no effect in abstracts of Cochrane reviews57 cited
  • 2011Evidence‐based medicine and Cochrane reviews in neonatology: Quo vadis?9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work