Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?

G. C. Goddu

25 citations0/0 files storedInformal Logic

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Abstract

The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is distorting the very organizational foundations of argumentation theory and should be abandoned.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach 2004A systematic theory of argumentation : the pragma-dialectical approach.2001Argument, Inference and Dialectic 2005The Logic of Deep Disagreements 1982The concepts of argument and arguing 2004An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation 2021The Logic of Deep Disagreements

Cited by

2011Arguments as Abstract Objects

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.