Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An Exploratory Study to Test the Impact on Three “Bolt-On” Items to the EQ-5D

12 references·2 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)9,783 cited
1996EuroQol: the current state of play5,812 cited
1997Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States4,543 cited
1996The time trade-off method: Results from a general population study697 cited
2014Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey418 cited
2012Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.416 cited
2014A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures280 cited
1999The Effect of Adding a Cognitive Dimension to the EuroQol Multiattribute Health-Status Classification System240 cited
2008NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal226 cited
2012Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome).187 cited
2011How Valid and Responsive Are Generic Health Status Measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review141 cited
2011A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Visual Disorders139 cited

Cited by

2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An Exploratory Study on Using Principal-Component Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Identify Bolt-On Dimensions: The EQ-5D Case Study

93 cited

2019Future Directions in Valuing Benefits for Estimating QALYs: Is Time Up for the EQ-5D?88 cited