Article2007

Ten Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript

31 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Journal of Roentgenology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to discuss the reasons that manuscripts fail to be published and to establish some principles for increasing the likelihood of publication. CONCLUSION: Many good manuscripts fail to be published because they violate a few simple rules for writing a superior journal article. This review presents 10 principles for increasing the likelihood of manuscript publication.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Scientific Basis for the Support of Biomedical Science 2001Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts 2004The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication 2005A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript 2002How I Review an Original Scientific Article 2005Writing It Up: A Step-by-Step Guide to Publication for Beginning Investigators 2005An Approach to the Writing of a Scientific Manuscript1

Cited by

2014How to Write Articles That Get Published 2008Publication in the AJR: Critical Interactions among Authors, Reviewers, and Section Editors 2015Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication 2015Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation 2022Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos 2014Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer‐reviewed journals in 2012

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.