The Constructed Explanation: Interpreting Election Results in the 1984 Presidential Race

Abstract

As a means of popular control over government, elections are a blunt instrument: powerful but not very articulate. The ballot gives voters the chance to select candidates, but not to explain why they made those choices. Officeholders and other activists have a powerful incentive to interpret what the voters meant. If they can find a plausible explanation of the vote, or construct a self-interested interpretation and get it accepted, then they can better select strategies and policies that will help them win the next election. This paper hypothesizes a process by which explanations for the vote are constructed in interaction among elected officials, activists, and journalists, and disseminated through media coverage. The possible explanations are winnowed to a relative few, which then become "conventional wisdom" about that election. These ideas are tested using content analysis of 1984 presidential election coverage in 18 opinion-leading newspapers. The paper discusses why some constructed explanations and not others emerged from this process, and considers the implications for public policy.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.