How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?

Christopher James Hopwood, M. Brent Donnellan

2010-04-30articlePersonality and Social Psychology Review661 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Personality trait inventories often perform poorly when their structure is evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The authors demonstrate poor CFA fit for several widely used personality measures with documented evidence of criterion-related validity but also show that some measures perform well from an exploratory factor analytic perspective. In light of these results, the authors suggest that the failure of these measures to fit CFA models is because of the inherent complexity of personality, issues related to its measurement, and issues related to the application and interpretation of CFA models. This leads to three recommendations for researchers interested in the structure and assessment of personality traits: (a) utilize and report on a range of factor analytic methods, (b) avoid global evaluations regarding the internal validity of multiscale personality measures based on model fit according to conventional CFA cutoffs, and (c) consider the substantive and practical implications of model modifications designed to improve fit.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 661 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.

1985The Satisfaction With Life Scale

1965Society and the Adolescent Self-Image

1980Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.

2000Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming

2007Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research

1998Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.

1999Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.

Cited by

2010What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure?

2013The Role of the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model in Moving Toward a Quantitative and Empirically Based Approach to Classifying Personality and Psychopathology

2011Psychopathic Personality

2011Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing

2014Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: Linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS Depression.

2023Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis

2018Translation and validation of body image instruments: Challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation

2013Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.