Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology

16 references·15 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,539 cited
2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
2012Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review395 cited
2005Is This Clinical Trial Fully Registered? — A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors354 cited
2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
2005Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)236 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008

Bias, Spin, and Misreporting: Time for Full Access to Trial Protocols and Results

144 cited

2007Clinical Trial Registration135 cited

2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited

Cited by

2017Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review54 cited
2017Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs51 cited
2016A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences46 cited
2017Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting41 cited
2023Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses33 cited
2016Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials31 cited
2018Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research29 cited
2018Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting20 cited
2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
2021Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health14 cited
2019Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials11 cited
2020Risk of Bias and Quality of Reporting in Colon and Rectal Cancer Systematic Reviews Cited by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines11 cited
2021Public access to protocols of contemporary cancer randomized clinical trials10 cited
2024Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study10 cited
2018Publication trends of study protocols in rehabilitation10 cited