References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2007Characteristics associated with rape attrition and the role played by scepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors118 cited
• 2002The `Ideal' Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect114 cited
• 2008Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases114 cited
• 2014What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived113 cited
• 2006Hostile Sexism and Rape Proclivity Amongst Men96 cited
• 2018The influence of ‘High’ vs. ‘Low’ rape myth acceptance on police officers' judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity94 cited
• 2011Here we go round the review-go-round: Rape investigation and prosecution—are things getting worse not better?70 cited
• 2000Unequivocal Victims: The Historical Roots of the Mystification of the Female Complainant in Rape Cases57 cited
• 2005Closing the Credibility Gap: The Prosecutorial Use of Expert Witness Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases56 cited
• 2006Are special measures for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses working? Evidence from the Criminal Justice Agencies53 cited
• 2016Lawyers’ Strategies for Cross-Examining Rape Complainants: Have we Moved Beyond the 1950s?51 cited
• 2017The impact of victim-perpetrator relationship, reputation and initial point of resistance on officers' responsibility and authenticity ratings towards hypothetical rape cases