SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
2 references·7 citing·33 second hop
Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Cooperation Between Research Institutions…Coping with scientific misconduct (2011)Coping with scientific miscon…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process (2019)Which Are the Tools Available…The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record (2019)The Hans Eysenck affair: Time…RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record (2018)RePAIR consensus guidelines: …How to Verify Plagiarism of the Paper Written in Macedonian and Translated in Foreign Language? (2016)How to Verify Plagiarism of t…Build infrastructure in publishing scientific journals to benefit medical scientists. (2014)Build infrastructure in publi…Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe (2013)Publication Ethics in Biomedi…Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals (2013)Authorship and Contributorshi…Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? (2007)Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Committee on publication ethics (2010)Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors (2015)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct (2018)NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia (2023)When Authorship Fails (1997)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? (2016)The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning (2017)CODE OF ETHICS (2013)Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)A General Theory of Behaviour (2018)Positive Affect and Health: What Do We Know and Where Next Should We Go? (2018)Research misconduct complaints and institutional logics: The case of Hans Eysenck and the British Psychological Society (2020)An Early History of the Heritability Coefficient Applied to Humans (1918–1960) (2021)The Biological Reductionism of Eysenck’s Psychology (2026)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How do Clarivate Analytics and Publons propose to fortify peer review in the COVID-19 era? (2021)Cross-sectional study of the relationship between women’s representation among editors and peer reviewers in journals of the British Medical Journal Publishing Group (2022)Understanding Coaching in Communication Research (2025)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe (2013)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 2011Coping with scientific misconduct39 cited

Cited by

  • 2019The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record25 cited
  • 2019Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process21 cited
  • 2018RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record18 cited
  • 2013Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe18 cited
  • 2016How to Verify Plagiarism of the Paper Written in Macedonian and Translated in Foreign Language?16 cited
  • 2013Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals16 cited
  • 2014Build infrastructure in publishing scientific journals to benefit medical scientists.8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work