SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accelerating scientific publication in biology
1 references·16 citing·35 second hop
Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Accelerating scientific publication in bi…Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (2017)Genetical Implications of the…Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Tracking changes between prep…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review (2021)Time from submission to publi…Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process (2020)Rise of the Rxivs: How Prepri…Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers (2020)Credibility of preprints: an …Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Comparing quality of reportin…Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Tracking the popularity and o…Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints and Scholarly Commu…On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)On the value of preprints: An…bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology (2019)bioRxiv: the preprint server …A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences (2019)A proposal for the future of …Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)Preprints: An underutilized m…The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s (2017)The prehistory of biology pre…Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission (2017)Ten simple rules to consider …Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Preprints for the life scienc…Preprint Déjà Vu (2016)Preprint Déjà VuDoes it take too long to publish research? (2016)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns (2020)Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 (2021)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge research (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Diffusion of innovations (2003)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Open science (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Heterogeneity in effect size estimates (2024)A New Biology for a New Century (2004)Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance (2004)Discovering DNA: Friedrich Miescher and the early years of nucleic acid research (2007)Making Open Science Work for Science and Society (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals (2020)Changing scientific meetings for the better (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid1,297 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints196 cited
  • 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
  • 2016Preprints for the life sciences178 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission162 cited
  • 2020Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature146 cited
  • 2019bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology140 cited
  • 2018Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science136 cited
  • 2019A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences114 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • 2022Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic95 cited
  • 2020Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process87 cited
  • 2020Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers83 cited
  • 2019Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers79 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s78 cited
  • 2021Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review59 cited
  • 2016Preprint Déjà Vu54 cited