Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review

Abstract

There is a growing need for integrating environmentally sound choices into supply‐chain management research and practice. Perusal of the literature shows that a broad frame of reference for green supply‐chain management (GrSCM) is not adequately developed. Regulatory bodies that formulate regulations to meet societal and ecological concerns to facilitate growth of business and economy also suffer from its absence. A succinct classification to help academicians, researchers and practitioners in understanding integrated GrSCM from a wider perspective is needed. Further, sufficient literature is available to warrant such classification. This paper takes an integrated and fresh look into the area of GrSCM. The literature on GrSCM is covered exhaustively from its conceptualization, primarily taking a ‘reverse logistics angle’. Using the rich body of available literature, including earlier reviews that had relatively limited perspectives, the literature on GrSCM is classified on the basis of the problem context in supply chain's major influential areas. It is also classified on the basis of methodology and approach adopted. Various mathematical tools/techniques used in literature vis‐à‐vis the contexts of GrSCM are mapped. A timeline indicating relevant papers is also provided as a ready reference. Finally, the findings and interpretations are summarized, and the main research issues and opportunities are highlighted.

Cite this

Samir K. Srivastava (2007). Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x

@article{k2007green,
  title  = {Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review},
  author = {Srivastava, Samir K.},
  year   = {2007},
  journal = {International Journal of Management Reviews},
  doi    = {10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3,984 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by