SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Are Authors Misinterpreting Their Results?
10 references·2 citing·45 second hop
Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Are Authors Misinterpreting Their Results? (2009)Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effe…Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research (2010)Initial National Priorities f…Does Comparative-Effectiveness Research Threaten Personalized Medicine? (2009)Does Comparative-Effectivenes…Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? (2009)Dealing with heterogeneity of…Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report (2009)Comparative-Effectiveness Res…Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views (2007)Life and times of the impact …Moderators of Treatment Outcomes (2006)Moderators of Treatment Outco…Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)Principles for international …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals (2001)Reporting on methods of subgr…Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact? (1986)Which Medical Journals Have t…Social Relationships and Salivary Telomere Length Among Middle-Aged and Older African American and White Adults (2017)Social Relationships and Sali…An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2017)An approach to addressing sub…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Cognitive–behavioral guided self-help for eating disorders: Effectiveness and scalability (2012)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Citation Indexing for Studying Science (1970)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)The risk epidemic in medical journals (1995)Do Pharmaceutical Sales Respond to Scientific Evidence? (2002)The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency (2006)Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results (2007)ADDIS: A decision support system for evidence-based medicine (2012)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees (2001)How Do Risk Factors Work Together? Mediators, Moderators, and Independent, Overlapping, and Proxy Risk Factors (2001)Emotional benefits of mindfulness-based stress reduction in older adults: the moderating roles of age and depressive symptom severity (2013)Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate (2013)Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Suggested Statistical Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Trials Data (2012)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores (2010)Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications (2014)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Prioritizing Comparative-Effectiveness Research — IOM Recommendations (2009)Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers (2010)Personality-informed interventions for healthy aging: Conclusions from a National Institute on Aging work group. (2013)Facts, Fallacies, and Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Part I. Basic Considerations (2010)Five Next Steps for a New National Program for Comparative-Effectiveness Research (2010)Patient and practitioner noncompliance: rationing, therapeutic uncertainty, and the missing conversation (2010)EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the Confusion (2010)Prioritization of Comparative Effectiveness Research Topics in Hospital Pediatrics (2012)Advances in Patient Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS Measures (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2010Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research391 cited
  • 2006Moderators of Treatment Outcomes310 cited
  • 2005Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)236 cited
  • 2009Does Comparative-Effectiveness Research Threaten Personalized Medicine?231 cited
  • 1986Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact?189 cited
  • 2007Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views164 cited
  • 2009Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report160 cited
  • 2009Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge?111 cited
  • 2001Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals27 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Social Relationships and Salivary Telomere Length Among Middle-Aged and Older African American and White Adults27 cited
  • 2017An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work