Scientific Work and Uncertainty

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of local uncertainties encountered by working scientists into global certainty, or `scientific facts'. It discusses six mechanisms by which scientists transform local uncertainty: attributing certainty to the results of other fields; substituting processual for production evaluations in the face of technical failures; ideal type substitutions; shifting clinical and basic evaluation criteria; ad hoc generalizing of case studies; and the subsuming of epistemological questions in internal debates. The data are drawn from a study of late nineteenth-century British neurophysiologists (surgeons, neurologists, pathologists, physiologists). The approach is drawn from the sociology of work.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 202 citations exist upstream.