Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use

Abstract

Behavioral scientists have long sought measures of important psychological constructs that avoid response biases and other problems associated with direct reports. Recently, a large number of such indirect, or "implicit," measures have emerged. We review research that has utilized these measures across several domains, including attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, and discuss their predictive validity, their interrelations, and the mechanisms presumably underlying their operation. Special attention is devoted to various priming measures and the Implicit Association Test, largely due to their prevalence in the literature. We also attempt to clarify several unresolved theoretical and empirical issues concerning implicit measures, including the nature of the underlying constructs they purport to measure, the conditions under which they are most likely to relate to explicit measures, the kinds of behavior each measure is likely to predict, their sensitivity to context, and the construct's potential for change.

Cite this

Russell H. Fázio, Michael A. Olson (2002). Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225

@article{h2002implicit,
  title  = {Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use},
  author = {Fázio, Russell H. and Olson, Michael A.},
  year   = {2002},
  journal = {Annual Review of Psychology},
  doi    = {10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,587 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by