Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches

Abstract

This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.

Cite this

Mark C. Suchman (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

@article{c1995managing,
  title  = {Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches},
  author = {Suchman, Mark C.},
  year   = {1995},
  journal = {Academy of Management Review},
  doi    = {10.2307/258788}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19,858 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by