Articlediamond2012

Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs

56 citations0/0 files storedTechnology Innovation Management Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Usability and User Interface Design Open Source Software Innovations

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough the quotation topping this article may sound dated, this line of reasoning is closely associated with the technology-push paradigm and has dominated the view on innovation for a long time. The market-pull paradigm, dating back to the 1960s, shifted the focus from pure invention and development of technology towards the eventual adopter and user of the

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2022The relationship between the living lab approach and successful implementation of healthcare innovations: an integrative review 2018Key Constructs and a Definition of Living Labs as Innovation Platforms 2013A fourfold typology of living labs: An empirical investigation amongst the ENoLL community 2019nnovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework 2018A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature 2019An Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approach to Developing and Testing a New Sustainable Mobility System 2015Open innovation practices adopted by private stakeholders: perspectives for living labs 2013Living labs as quasi-experiments: results from the Flemish LeYLab

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.