Perceptions of faculty in health care and social sciences on teaching international students

Abstract

Increased cultural diversity of higher education (HE) students has created both learning opportunities and teaching challenges for vocational health care programs. An internationalized curriculum reflects sociocultural issues in professional practice and enhances intercultural competency amongst students. However, the literature is limited in seeking the key perspective of those delivering the curriculum. This study explores the awareness of health care teaching staff on issues related to internationalization, perceived responsibility in supporting international students, and teaching practices toward an inclusive curriculum. An anonymous questionnaire was developed, consisting of different types of questions (Y/N, Likert scale, and multiple choice) with opportunities for free text on each main theme. The questionnaire was sent to all 205 staff members with a teaching remit at Cardiff University Schools of Postgraduate Medicine, Healthcare Sciences, Pharmacy, and Social Sciences. In all, 102 responses were received. Despite 70% of respondents feeling that the responsibility for an improved learning experience for international students lies beyond them—with the University, their School, or students themselves—inclusive teaching practices that consider cultural diversity are widely reported. Some individuals feel unprepared to teach international students, citing a lack of cultural knowledge and training. The proportion of international students is perceived as the most important aspect of internationalization. Other key components of national and institutional HE strategies, such as “internationalization abroad”, appear to be relatively unimportant. Findings from this study provide a basis for all higher education institutions educating health and social care professionals to reflect critically on the realities of engaging with the internationalization of vocational programs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.