Digging Deeper: Mining‐Dependent Regions in Historical Perspective1

Abstract

Abstract The implications of natural resource extraction for local economic development have become the subject of sharply conflicting expectations, with long‐term outcomes predicted to range from regional economic growth and development to “progressive underdevelopment.” These differences in longer‐term expectations cannot be satisfactorily resolved through the use of cross‐sectional or short‐term data. In addition, existing theories tend to be stated in universalistic terms that discourage rather than facilitate the examination of differences across cases. These points are illustrated through a case‐study examination of what has been called the first mining boom in the United States, involving lead mines in the Upper Mississippi Valley during the first half of the 19th century. The developmental consequences of this mining boom appear neither to have been as favorable as predicted by the most enthusiastic proponents of extraction nor as negative as those predicted by the harshest critics. Instead, outcomes appear to have reflected intersecting configurations of physical resource characteristics, the organizational form/scale of extractive activities, the historical period in question, and the nature of relationships among competing resource uses and users.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.