Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Power Rivalries, 1816-1980

Abstract

This research note analyzes the importance of geography for the study of conflict and explores the question: Does the geographic location (relative to the nations involved) of a confrontation influence the likelihood that the confrontation will escalate to war? It was discovered that if a dispute is contiguous by land to one of the disputants, the likelihood of escalation is increased (and increased even more if both sides are contiguous to the site). Ninety-two percent of the wars in the sample began with a dispute that was contiguous to one or both disputants; only two percent of the noncontiguous disputes escalated to war. Various interpretations of the results and suggestions for future research are noted.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 145 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.