SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen in der Chirurgie
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen in der Chirurgie (2007)Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Meta…The use of systematic reviews when designing studies (2005)The use of systematic reviews…Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Evidence‐based Medicine (2005)Role of Systematic Reviews an…Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature (2005)Evaluating Meta-analyses in t…A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)A checklist to evaluate a rep…Users' guide to the surgical literature. How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery. (2004)Users' guide to the surgical …Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (2004)Tips for learners of evidence…Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Review and Apply Findings of Healthcare Research. (2004)Systematic Reviews to Support…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasSystematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed (2010)Objective measurements of sleep for non-laboratory settings as alternatives to polysomnography - a systematic review (2010)MEDITATIVE THERAPIES FOR REDUCING ANXIETY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS (2012)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)METHODOLOGICAL INDEX FOR NON-RANDOMIZED STUDIES ( MINORS ): DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT (2003)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 2005A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus308 cited
  • 2004Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat202 cited
  • 2004Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Review and Apply Findings of Healthcare Research.200 cited
  • 2005Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature129 cited
  • 2005The use of systematic reviews when designing studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

97 cited
  • 2005Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Evidence‐based Medicine85 cited
  • 2004Users' guide to the surgical literature. How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery.70 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.