SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate
8 references·2 citing·42 second hop
The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate (2015)The Importance of Integration of Stakehol…Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’ (2014)Core Outcome Measures in Effe…Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Choosing Important Health Out…Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years (2013)Outcome measures in rheumatoi…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children (2008)A Systematic Review of Studie…Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Standardising outcomes for cl…Evaluating Maternity Care: A Core Set of Outcome Measures (2007)Evaluating Maternity Care: A …Depression, physical illness, and the faces of Rembrandt (1999)Depression, physical illness,…Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development (2016)Three nested randomized contr…Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates (2016)Including patients in core ou…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study (2017)The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion (1969)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Core Outcome Domains for Controlled Trials and Clinical Recordkeeping in Eczema: International Multiperspective Delphi Consensus Process (2010)Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people (2012)Core Outcome Sets (2017)Depression, physical illness, and the faces of Rembrandt (1999)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery (2015)A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis (2017)Toward Establishing Core Outcome Domains For Trials in Kidney Transplantation (2017)The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? (1994)A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing (2001)DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?Application in practice (2011)Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study (2016)Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement (2018)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review (2011)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice (2017)Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection (2019)Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2007Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews482 cited
  • 2014Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review338 cited
  • 2014Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’332 cited
  • 2008A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children202 cited
  • 2013Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years171 cited
  • 2007Evaluating Maternity Care: A Core Set of Outcome Measures170 cited
  • 1999Depression, physical illness, and the faces of Rembrandt9 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates129 cited
  • 2016Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development123 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work