Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach

Elena Lieven · Heike Behrens · JENNIFER SPEARES · Michael Tomasello

538 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Child Language

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language Development and Disorders Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Child and Animal Learning Development

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to determine the degree to which a sample of one child's creative utterances related to utterances that the child previously produced. The utterances to be accounted for were all of the intelligible, multi-word utterances produced by the child in a single hour of interaction with her mother early in her third year of life (at age 2;1.11). We used a high-density database consisting of 5 hours of recordings per week together with a maternal diary for the previous 6 weeks. Of the 295 multi-word utterances on tape, 37% were 'novel' in the sense that they had not been said in their entirety before. Using a morpheme-matching method, we identified the way(s) in which each novel utterance differed from its closest match in the preceding corpus. In 74% of the cases we required only one operation to match the previous utterance and the great majority of these consisted of the substitution of a word (usually a noun) into a previous utterance or schema. Almost all the other single-operation utterances involved adding a word onto the beginning or end of a previous utterance. 26% of the novel, multi-word utterances required more than one operation to match the closest previous utterance, although many of these only involved a combination of the two operations seen for the single-operation utterances. Some others were, however, more complex to match. The results suggest that the relatively high degree of creativity in early English child language could be at least partially based upon entrenched schemas and a small number of simple operations to modify them. We discuss the implications of these results for the interplay in language production between strings registered in memory and categorial knowledge.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 538 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 1974A First Language: The Early Stages 2001Radical Construction Grammar 1998The architecture of the language faculty . By Ray Jackendoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. Pp. xvi, 262. Paper $20.00.1995Regular morphology and the lexicon 2013Learnability and Cognition 1970Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars 2000Do young children have adult syntactic competence?

Cited by

2008Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning 2003Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence 2005Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions 2009Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis 2011Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax.2007Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.