The high cost of diarrhoeal illness for urban slum households–a cost-recovery approach: a cohort study

Ronak Bhailal Patel · Hanni Stoklosa · Shrutika Shitole · Tejal Shitole · Kiran Sawant · Mahesh Nanarkar +3 more

26 citations0/0 files storedBMJ Open

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban and Rural Development Challenges Child Nutrition and Water Access Public Health and Environmental Issues

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rapid urbanisation has often meant that public infrastructure has not kept pace with growth leading to urban slums with poor access to water and sanitation and high rates of diarrhoea with greater household costs due to illness. This study sought to determine the monetary cost of diarrhoea to urban slum households in Kaula Bandar slum in Mumbai, India. The study also tested the hypotheses that the cost of water and sanitation infrastructure may be surpassed by the cumulative costs of diarrhoea for households in an urban slum community. DESIGN: A cohort study using a baseline survey of a random sample followed by a systematic longitudinal household survey. The baseline survey was administered to a random sample of households. The systematic longitudinal survey was administered to every available household in the community with a case of diarrhoea for a period of 5 weeks. PARTICIPANTS: Every household in Kaula Bandar was approached for the longitudinal survey and all available and consenting adults were included. RESULTS: The direct cost of medical care for having at least one person in the household with diarrhoea was 205 rupees. Other direct costs brought total expenses to 291 rupees. Adding an average loss of 55 rupees per household from lost wages and monetising lost productivity from homemakers gave a total loss of 409 rupees per household. During the 5-week study period, this community lost an estimated 163 600 rupees or 3635 US dollars due to diarrhoeal illness. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of basic water and sanitation infrastructure is expensive for urban slum households in this community. Financing approaches that transfer that cost to infrastructure development to prevent illness may be feasible. These findings along with the myriad of unmeasured benefits of preventing diarrhoeal illness add to pressing arguments for investment in basic water and sanitation infrastructure.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis 2004URBAN HEALTH: Evidence, Challenges, and Directions 2008Urban health in developing countries: What do we know and where do we go?2002Field survey on water supply, sanitation and associated health impacts in urban poor communities - a case from Mumbai City, India 2009Burden of Illness in the First 3 Years of Life in an Indian Slum

Cited by

2022The economics of healthcare access: a scoping review on the economic impact of healthcare access for vulnerable urban populations in low- and middle-income countries 2019The Urbanization of the Sanitation Crisis: Placing Waste in the City 2023Divided infrastructure: legal exclusion and water inequality in an urban slum in Mumbai, India 2023Spatializing stigma-power: Mental health impacts of spatial stigma in a legally-excluded settlement in Mumbai, India

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.