SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta‐analysis
16 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta‐analysis (2010)Modelling multiple sources of disseminati…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)Comparison of Two Methods to …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)Outcome selection bias in met…A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints (2005)A modified test for small‐stu…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies (2000)Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to …Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Operating Characteristics of …Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis (1992)Modeling Publication Selectio…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean Differences (1984)Estimation of Effect Size und…Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach (2023)Correcting for outcome report…Weighing Evidence “Steampunk” Style via the Meta-Analyser (2016)Weighing Evidence “Steampunk”…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias16,951 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2006Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis2,273 cited
  • 2005A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints2,270 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 1992Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis359 cited
  • 1984Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean Differences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

241 cited
  • 2000Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies194 cited
  • 2005Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis187 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Weighing Evidence “Steampunk” Style via the Meta-Analyser10 cited
    • 2023Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach9 cited