Understanding objects in motion. An archaeological dialogue on Romanization

Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that Romanization revolves around understanding objects in motion and that Roman archaeologists should therefore focus on (1) globalization theory and (2) material-culture studies as important theoretical directions for the (near) future. The present state and scope of the Romanization debate, however, seem to prevent a fruitful development in that direction. The first part of this paper therefore briefly analyses the Romanization debate and argues that large parts of ‘Anglo-Saxon Roman archaeology’ have never been really post-colonial, but in fact from the mid-1990s onwards developed a theoretical position that should be characterized as anti-colonial. This ideologically motivated development has resulted in several unhealthy divides within the field, as well as in an uncomfortable ending of the Romanization debate. The present consensus within English-speaking Roman archaeology ‘to do away with Romanization’ does not seem to get us at all ‘beyond Romans and Natives’, and, moreover, has effectively halted most of the discussion about how to understand and conceptualize ‘Rome’. The second part of the article presents two propositions outlining how to move forward: globalization theory and material-culture studies. Through this focus we will be able to better understand ‘Rome’ as (indicating) objects in motion and the human–thing entanglements resulting from a remarkable punctuation of connectivity. This focus is important as an alternative perspective to all existing narratives about Romanization because these remain fundamentally historical, in the sense that they reduce objects to expressions (of identity) alone. It is time for our discussions about ‘Rome’ to move ‘beyond representation’ and to become genuinely archaeological at last, by making material culture, with its agency and materiality, central to the analyses.

Cite this

Miguel John Versluys (2014). Understanding objects in motion. An archaeological dialogue on Romanization. Archaeological Dialogues. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203814000038

@article{john2014understanding,
  title  = {Understanding objects in motion. An archaeological dialogue on Romanization},
  author = {Versluys, Miguel John},
  year   = {2014},
  journal = {Archaeological Dialogues},
  doi    = {10.1017/s1380203814000038}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 204 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by