SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions
16 references·3 citing·31 second hop
A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions (2014)A systematic review and meta-analysis of …Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011)Cochrane handbook for systema…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Meta-Regression in Stata (2008)Meta-Regression in StataCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Methods for the Economic Eval…A comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups (2004)A comparison of the EQ‐5D and…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)The estimation of a preferenc…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey (1998)Variations in population heal…Multi-Attribute Health Status Classification Systems (1995)Multi-Attribute Health Status…Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation (1985)Probabilistic Sensitivity Ana…Social inequality and fractures—secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study (2018)Social inequality and fractur…Recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis: outcomes of an experts’ consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the US branch of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (2018)Recommendations for the condu…Health Utility Values Associated with Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review (2015)Health Utility Values Associa…The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? (2016)Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2005Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes13,647 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2002The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-363,031 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
  • 1998Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey1,059 cited
  • 2008Meta-Regression in Stata896 cited
  • 1985Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation860 cited
  • 1995Multi-Attribute Health Status Classification Systems819 cited
  • 2011Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

810 cited
  • 2004A comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups797 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis: outcomes of an experts’ consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the US branch of the International Osteoporosis Foundation89 cited
    • 2015Health Utility Values Associated with Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review70 cited
    • 2018Social inequality and fractures—secular trends in the Danish population: a case-control study25 cited