Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Validity and reliability of palpation-digitization for non-invasive kinematic measurement – A systematic review

11 references·1 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
2001Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness863 cited
2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
1997Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?479 cited
2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
2000Publication and related biases.427 cited
2010The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)375 cited
2009A Review of Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reliability of Static Spinal Palpation: A Literature Synthesis113 cited
2008Reliability of intra- and inter-rater palpation discrepancy and estimation of its effects on joint angle measurements44 cited

Cited by

2019A systematic review on the validity and reliability of tape measurement method in leg length discrepancy.14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work