Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: 1. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights

Sanford Goldstone · William T. Lhamon

142 citations0/0 files storedPerceptual and Motor Skills

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Multisensory perception and integration Neuroscience and Music Perception Tactile and Sensory Interactions

Abstract

Prior studies have repeatedly shown that short sounds were judged to be of longer duration than physically equivalent lights. Six experiments are reported which confirm the robustness of this auditory-visual difference in time judgment and highlight two factors which contribute to its continued presence, movement for vision and intensity for audition.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 142 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011Duration channels mediate human time perception 2004Perception of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Children and Adults 2006When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?2011Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation 2006Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model 2009Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception 2011Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed 2014Experience of and in Time

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.