Global self-esteem and specific self-views as determinants of people's reactions to success and failure.

Keith A. Dutton · Jonathon D. Brown

190 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality and Social Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Personality Traits and Psychology Social and Intergroup Psychology Emotions and Moral Behavior

Abstract

A critical question in self-esteem research is whether people's reactions to success and failure are guided by their global self-esteem level or by their more specific beliefs about their abilities and attributes. To address this issue, the authors led participants to experience success or failure on an alleged test and then assessed their cognitive and emotional reactions to these outcomes. In Experiment 1, specific self-views predicted participants' cognitive reactions to their performance outcomes, whereas global self-esteem predicted participants' emotional reactions to their performance outcomes. In Experiment 2, global self-esteem predicted participants' emotional reactions to their performance outcomes even after participants' beliefs about their more specific abilities and attributes were taken into account. These findings suggest that when it comes to understanding people's emotional reactions to success and failure, the effects of global self-esteem are not reducible to the way people think about their constituent qualities. Few statements are as incontrovertible as this: The way people feel about themselves is an important aspect of psychological life. Laypeople and professionals alike refer to these feelings as indicative a person's level of self-esteem. Through the years, self-esteem has been linked to a wide variety of social psychological phenomena, including conformity (Brockner, 1984), persuasion (Rhodes & Wood, 1992), cognitive dissonance (Steele, Spencer, & Lynch, 1993 ), subjective well-being (Diener & Diener, 1995), and social comparison processes (Aspinwall & Taylor, 1993; Gibbons & Gerrard, 1991; Wood, Giordano-Beech, Taylor, Michela, & Gaus, 1994),just to name a few. Self-esteem also appears to influence people's reactions to valenced outcomes. High self-esteem (HSE) people make more self-serving attributions for performance outcomes (Blaine & Crocker, 1993) and suffer less emotional distress when they fail than do low self-esteem (LSE) people (Brown & Dutton, 1995). The purpose of this article is to examine the source of these differences. One possibility is that these tendencies stem from differences in how the two self-esteem groups think about their particular abilities and attributes. HSE people generally think they have high ability and expect to do well when undertaking an achievement-related task. These perceptions could guide their reactions to failure. After all, if one thinks one has high ability, it is only logical to assume that success is due to one's ability but failure is not (Blaine & Crocker, 1993; Marsh, 1986; Miller & Ross,

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 190 citations exist upstream.

References

1965Society and the Adolescent Self-Image 2002Social Foundations of Thought and Action 1977Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.1979Conceiving the self 2013The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry 1986An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion 1965The antecedents of self-esteem 1968Personality and Assessment

Cited by

2007Self‐esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self‐evaluations or affective self‐regard?2010High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling 2002The Importance of Students' Goals in Their Emotional Experience of Academic Failure: Investigating the Precursors and Consequences of Shame 2006Offensive Defensiveness: Toward an Integrative Neuroscience of Compensatory Zeal After Mortality Salience, Personal Uncertainty, and Other Poignant Self-Threats 2001Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals.2007Social acceptance and self-esteem: Tuning the sociometer to interpersonal value.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.