SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterFallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Frans H. van Eemeren2015

OA

Chaptergreen2015

Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Frans H. van Eemeren · Rob Grootendorst

107 citations·0/0 files stored·Argumentation library

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Rhetoric and Communication Studies Discourse Analysis in Language Studies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 107 citations exist upstream.

References

1969Speech Acts 1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions 1970Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. By John R. Searle Cambridge: University Press, 1969. Pp. viii, 203. $7.50.1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion 1982From Axiom to Dialogue 1989From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation 1983Conversational coherence : form, structure, and strategy 1987Handbook of Argumentation Theory

Cited by

2006Two Forms of the Straw Man 1997Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What's really at stake in the disputes?2014Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation 2010Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring in reacting critically 2015The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Lifearticle · 7 shared references 2015Argumentation Studies’ Five Estateschapter · 7 shared references 1987Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspectivearticle · 5 shared references 2000Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Frameworkarticle · 5 shared references 1991Critical faults and fallacies of questioningarticle · 5 shared references 2012In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialecticsarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typechapter

Published2015-01-01

VenueArgumentation library

ISSN-L1566-7650

Languageen

Citations107

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_29

openalex_workW2167803733

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

1999

The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam

1998Toward a normative model of rational argumentation for critical accounting discussions

1992So what? Profiles for relevance criticism in persuation dialogues