Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Gender Differences in Scientists’ Public Outreach and Engagement Activities

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1991Scale Development : Theory and Applications15,552 cited
1995The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies7,046 cited
1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
1993The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science1,008 cited
2006Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?970 cited
1999Science's new social contract with society881 cited
1999Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility590 cited
1986The Public Understanding of Science373 cited
2007What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?355 cited
2001Communicating Science299 cited
2005Cultural Representations of Gender and Science200 cited
2005Scientists and Public Outreach: Participation, Motivations, and Impediments190 cited
2008From Public Understanding to Public Engagement152 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008Meaningful Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology130 cited

Cited by

2020Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement106 cited
2018‘Human’ or ‘objective’ faces of science? Gender stereotypes and the representation of scientists in the media74 cited
2023Women Scientists on TikTok: New Opportunities to Become Visible and Challenge Gender Stereotypes32 cited
2016Public science communication in Africa: views and practices of academics at the National University of Science and Technology in Zimbabwe30 cited
2020Scientists as public communicators: individual- and institutional-level motivations and barriers for public communication in Singapore29 cited
2023`Pandem-icons' — exploring the characteristics of highly visible scientists during the Covid-19 pandemic29 cited
2018Microbiologists’ Public Engagement Views and Behaviors28 cited
2019Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement27 cited
2016Madam Science Communicator26 cited
2022A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science24 cited
2017In the footsteps of Einstein, Sagan and Barnard: Identifying South Africa’s most visible scientists23 cited
2019Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns23 cited
2020The impact a-gender: gendered orientations towards research Impact and its evaluation23 cited
2022Expert voices in South African mass media during the COVID-19 pandemic20 cited
2022The Sagan Effect and Scientists’ Public Outreach Participation in China: Multilayered Roles of Social Norms and Rewards19 cited
2017“Robots Vs Animals”16 cited