Response to Historical Perspective

Alan G. Kamhi

27 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Learning Disabilities

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Writing and Handwriting Education Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Abstract

The strength of Richardson's historical perspective of dyslexia is that it illuminates some historical antecedents of dyslexia that may be unfamiliar to readers. Its weakness is that it fails to address the definitional issues associated with dyslexia. These issues are addressed in the present article. A definition of dyslexia is offered that considers the nature of the processing limitation that underlies the disorder as well as the developmental changes that occur in the manifestation of the disorder.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Modularity of Mind 1986Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability 1983Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection 1988Explaining the Differences Between the Dyslexic and the Garden-Variety Poor Reader 1991Discrepancy Definitions of Reading Disability: Has Intelligence Led Us Astray?1983An invited article: Phonological recoding and reading acquisition 1984Phonological Awareness and Verbal Short-Term Memory 1991Naming Speed and Reading: The Contribution of the Cognitive Neurosciences

Cited by

1995Examination of the stability of two methods of defining specific language impairment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.