Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives

Abstract

Are there any common denominators within the diversity of entrepreneurship literature that may serve as foundations for understanding the entrepreneurial process in a systematic and comprehensive way that is useful to both scholars and practitioners? The objective of this paper was to discover about the entrepreneurial process what, if anything, is both generic ( all processes that are “entrepreneurial” do this) and distinct ( only entrepreneurial processes do this). Our approach was to evaluate published models of entrepreneurial process to discover what scholars have argued about what entrepreneurs do and how they do it (the processes they use) and to seek out any key commonalities that scholars claim are associated with the phenomenon. Unfortunately for the field, the investigation demonstrates that, as at the time of our investigation, the 32 extant models of entrepreneurial process are highly fragmented in their claims and emphases and are insufficient for establishing an infrastructure upon which to synthesize an understanding of entrepreneurial process that is both generic and distinct. Insights gained in the study lead to suggestions for future research and theory development of which the most urgent is the need to develop a single harmonized model of entrepreneurial process capable of embracing the best of what is on offer and adding new theoretical arguments in areas where practice shows that they are lacking.

Cite this

Peter W. Moroz, Kevin G. Hindle (2011). Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x

@article{w2011entrepreneurship,
  title  = {Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives},
  author = {Moroz, Peter W. and Hindle, Kevin G.},
  year   = {2011},
  journal = {Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice},
  doi    = {10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 419 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by