SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial
14 references·8 citing·37 second hop
Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial (2010)Assessing the potential for outcome repor…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots (2008)Reasons or excuses for avoidi…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)Outcome selection bias in met…Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis (2004)Identification and impact of …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies (2000)Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to …Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review (2019)Physical Harm and Death in th…Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study (2016)Rethinking the assessment of …Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups (2015)Managing the incidence of sel…Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviews (2014)Multivariate meta-analysis he…Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis (2013)Selective reporting of outcom…Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews (2013)Can trial quality be reliably…A model-based correction for outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis (2013)A model-based correction for …Bias in systematic reviews? (2011)Bias in systematic reviews?Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2008Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots457 cited
  • 2000Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies194 cited
  • 2005Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis187 cited
  • 2004Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis130 cited

Cited by

  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
146 cited
  • 2016Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study60 cited
  • 2013Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis55 cited
  • 2013Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews48 cited
  • 2013A model-based correction for outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis36 cited
  • 2014Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviews22 cited
  • 2015Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups20 cited
  • 2011Bias in systematic reviews?11 cited