What is the Constructivism in Constructive Alignment?

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of constructive alignment in respect of science education. The concept is placed in the context of its two contributory components - constructivism and instructional alignment. The former has a well-established body of critical literature that highlights the challenges of constructivism for both science and science education. The instructional alignment component is a long-standing behaviourist approach to curriculum planning. Linking the two components in constructive alignment purports to offer “a theory of learning that is broad-based and empirically sound, and that easily translates into practice” married to “an aligned design for teaching”. This approach appears to have the uncritical support of key organisations in UK Higher Education. However, we suggest that linking two contested theories is unlikely to lead to generally sound advice on either curriculum design or approaches to science teaching.We would identify our perspective not as that of constructivists, but rather as realists, accepting that “science is a construction, but one in which discoveries are irreducible to the construction and social conditions, which made them possible” (Bourdieu, 2004).

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.