SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?
6 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Knowledge in a Social WorldThe Advancement of Science (1995)The Advancement of ScienceContent Preservation (1993)Content PreservationThe Role of Trust in Knowledge (1991)The Role of Trust in KnowledgeLaboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Laboratory Life: The Construc…Epistemic Dependence (1985)Epistemic DependenceScience education in an age of misinformation (2023)Science education in an age o…Bad Beliefs (2021)Bad BeliefsEpistemic democracy and the role of experts (2019)Epistemic democracy and the r…Philosophy and Climate Science (2018)Philosophy and Climate ScienceGrasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence (2018)Grasp of evidence: Problemati…On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance (2017)On the Goals of Epistemic Edu…Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty (2017)Epistemic trust and the ethic…Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain (2016)Investigating Trust, Expertis…Rationality: a social-epistemology perspective (2014)Rationality: a social-epistem…When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement (2012)When is consensus knowledge b…Justice, Disagreement and Democracy (2012)Justice, Disagreement and Dem…Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups (2012)Epistemic dependence in inter…Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence (2010)Peer Disagreement and Higher‐…Toward an epistemology ofWikipedia (2008)Toward an epistemology ofWiki…Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy (2006)Testimony and Epistemic Auton…Against Coherence (2005)Against CoherenceA theory of justice original editionThe Problem of Social Cost (1960)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance (2007)Epistemic Vigilance (2010)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory (2011)The influence of emotional intelligence, cognitive test anxiety, and coping strategies on undergraduate academic performance (2017)To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony's effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect (2017)Integrating STEM into Preschool Education; Designing a Professional Development Model in Diverse Settings (2018)Knowledge and its Limits (2002)Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News (2007)The Philosophy of Philosophy (2007)Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy (2009)Higher‐Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat (2014)The Importance of Being Rational (2018)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Where's the evidence that active learning works? (2006)STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania (2009)ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES (2018)An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690)The Philosophical Works of Descartes. (1914)Meaning (1957)Second-Hand Knowledge* (2006)The Epistemic Threat of Deepfakes (2020)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. (1979)Democracy and Education (2015)A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems (2020)Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? (2020)Commensuration as a Social Process (1998)Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms (2000)Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines (2001)Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust (1998)Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment (1999)Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique (2003)Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction (2010)Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know (2006)Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective (2012)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts7,544 cited
  • 1999Knowledge in a Social World2,170 cited
  • 1993Content Preservation929 cited
  • 1985Epistemic Dependence924 cited
  • 1991The Role of Trust in Knowledge882 cited
  • 1995The Advancement of Science780 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence580 cited
  • 2006Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy309 cited
  • 2014Rationality: a social-epistemology perspective243 cited
  • 2017On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance230 cited
  • 2016Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain216 cited
  • 2023Science education in an age of misinformation199 cited
  • 2012Justice, Disagreement and Democracy191 cited
  • 2017Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty188 cited
  • 2018Philosophy and Climate Science178 cited
  • 2012When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

164 cited
  • 2018Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence164 cited
  • 2005Against Coherence158 cited
  • 2021Bad Beliefs157 cited
  • 2008Toward an epistemology ofWikipedia148 cited
  • 2012Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups146 cited
  • 2019Epistemic democracy and the role of experts142 cited