‘What if?’: Synthesizing debates and advancing prospects of using virtual history in management and organization theory

Abstract

As the ‘historic turn’ in management and organization studies gathers pace scholars are shifting their attention to questions such as what constitutes management and organization history. This article debates and advances the prospects of using virtual history in management and organization theory.The article begins by reviewing some of the most vociferous opponents of counterfactual history and it addresses each one of their arguments in turn. It then proceeds on to consider a range of perspectives on the criteria that should be used to ensure scholarly rigour in the writing of counterfactual history. Following, the article seeks to advance the prospects of using counterfactual history in management and organization theory. The article concludes that counterfactuals already constitute an important part of both our cognitive and scholarly processes of reasoning, and they influence judgements and decision-making. Consequently, they have the potential to make valuable contributions to both the theory and practice of researching and managing organizations.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.