Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements

7 references·7 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
1999Measuring agreement in method comparison studies9,616 cited
1989A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility8,782 cited
2002Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement413 cited
2004Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings66 cited
2001ROBUST ESTIMATORS OF THE CONCORDANCE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT64 cited
2007Assessing Individual Agreement55 cited

Cited by

2009Use of the Concordance Correlation Coefficient When Examining Agreement in Dyadic Research30 cited
2015A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements25 cited
2017The auricular surface as age indicator in a modern Greek sample: A test of two qualitative methods16 cited
2010Estimation of coefficients of individual agreement (CIAs) for quantitative and binary data using SAS and R14 cited
2013Correcting for rater bias in scores on a continuous scale, with application to breast density13 cited
2011Assessment of observer agreement for matched repeated binary measurements13 cited
2007Assessing Observer Agreement in Studies Involving Replicated Binary Observations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited