Dividend Taxes and Firm Valuation: New Evidence

Alan J. Auerbach · Kevin A. Hassett

66 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Economic Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Finance and Governance Financial Markets and Investment Strategies Corporate Taxation and Avoidance

Abstract

Dividend Taxes and Firm Valuation: New Evidence By Alan J. Auerbach and Kevin A. Hassett * The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Act of 2003 (JGTRA03) reduced the tax rates on dividends, with the highest statutory tax rate of 35 percent falling to 15 percent. An interesting twist on the dividend tax cut was its temporary nature; the provision as passed was effective only through 2008, and (as recent Congressional deliberations have illustrated), the extension its supporters envisioned was by no means certain. This large dividend tax reduction, along with its sunset provision, offers an unusual natural research experiment on the effects of dividend taxation. The theory of dividend taxation suggests three possible scenarios for the effects of the dividend tax reduction. Under the “tax irrelevance” view, the marginal shareholder is a tax-free entity (or a taxable investor who ignores or can offset incremental taxes), and the dividend tax reduction has no effect on equity values or firm behavior. Under the “traditional” view the marginal source of equity finance is new share issuance, and the tax reduction feeds through to the firm’s user cost and stimulates extra capital formation. Share values rise in the short run but, after full adjustment, the higher capital level reduces the marginal revenue product of capital enough to offset the dividend tax reduction, leaving equity prices the same. Under the “new” view, the marginal source of finance is retained earnings and the dividend tax cut is capitalized into the share price of the firm but has no investment effect. Understanding the economic consequences of the dividend tax reduction requires knowledge of the empirical relevance of these competing views. Our previous paper (Auerbach and Hassett 2005) performed an event-study analysis of a large panel of firms to determine how firm attributes affected the valuation response over eight key event dates leading up to the 2003 legislation. Our results, taken together, rejected outright

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Dividend Taxes and Corporate Behavior: Evidence from the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut 2004Taxation and Corporate Payout Policy 2005Dividend Taxes and Corporate Behavior: Evidence From the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut*2005The 2003 Dividend Tax Cuts and the Value of the Firm: An Event Study

Cited by

2010Dividend Taxes and International Portfolio Choice 2008How Did the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut Affect Stock Prices?2008Ex-Dividend Day Price and Volume: The Case of 2003 Dividend Tax Cut 2017Measuring Tax-Sensitive Institutional Investor Ownership 2013Did the 2003 Tax Act Increase Capital Investments by Corporations?2021Corporate dividend smoothing: The role of cross-listing 2013Intangible investment and Ramsey capital taxation 2008Dividend Taxation and Intertemporal Tax Arbitrage

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.